The challenge of liberalisation of the Argentine Wholesale Electricity Market in 2025

A risk governance process

Authors

  • Gerardo Rodríguez de la Vega Universidad del Norte Santo Tomás de Aquino

Keywords:

Risk Governance, Energy regulation, Institutional Engineering, economical reforming

Abstract

This article addresses the “normalization” of the Argentine Wholesale Electricity Market (MEM) through the lens of institutional economics and public policy. The reform is conceptually interpreted as an exercise in “regulation through deregulation”, where the State transitions from its historical role as a direct planner and provider to a meta-regulator that designs the framework for competition. The fundamental objective is to reconfigure the sector under the principles of the Liberal Regulatory State established by Law 24.065 of 1992. The central focus of the research lies in risk governance as the structural axis of the new regulatory matrix. This is settled through key instruments such as the obligation for distributors to contract 75% of their demand in the Forward Market (MAT) and the introduction of the Adapted Marginal Rent (RMA) for generators. These mechanisms replace administrative price control with a new architecture for private management of market exposure. The study concludes that the success or failure of this institutional engineering critically depends on the State’s capacity to manage the materialization of the transferred risks. Three systemic vulnerabilities are identified that condition the reform’s sustainability: macroeconomic volatility (inflation and exchange rate), the challenge of social legitimacy in the face of inevi table tariff increases for final users, and the necessity of building robust institutional credibility to ensure the predictability of rules in the long term. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Argentina. (1992). Ley Nº 24.065. Régimen de la Energía Eléctrica. Ministerio de Economía de la Nación. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/normativa/ nacional/ley-24065-464/actualizacion

Argentina. Secretaría de Energía. (1992). Estatuto de CAMMESA (constitución y objeto). InfoLEG. Ministerio de Justicia y Derechos Humanos. https://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/5000-9999/9615/ norma.htm

Argentina. Poder Ejecutivo Nacional. (4 de julio de 2025). Decreto 450/2025 (Transición y normalización del MEM). Boletín Oficial. https://www.boletinoficial.gob.ar/detalleAviso/primera/327922/20250707

Argentina. Ministerio de Economía. Secretaría de Energía. (20 de octubre de 2025). Resolución 400/2025 (Aprueba las Reglas para la Normalización del MEM y su Adaptación Progresiva). Boletín Oficial. https://www.boletinoficial.gob.ar/detalleAviso/primera/333149/20251021

Baldwin, R., Cave, M. & Lodge, M. (2012). Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice (2ª ed.). Oxford University Press.

Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage.

Da Empoli, G. (2019). Les ingénieurs du chaos. Éditions JC Lattès.

Easton, D. (1965). A Framework for Political Analysis. University of Chicago Press. https://archive.org/details/frameworkforpoli0000east

Eberlein, B. (2008). The making of the European energy market: The interplay of governance and government. Journal of Public Policy, 28(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X08000780

Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Polity Press.

Helm, D. (2003). Energy, the State, and the Market: British Energy Policy since 1979. Oxford University Press.

Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for all Seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x

Joskow, P. L. (2008). Lessons Learned From Electricity Market Liberalization. The Energy Journal, 29(2 suppl), 9-42. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol29-NoSI2-3

Levi-Faur, D. (2005). The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(1), 12-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204272371

Lodge, M. & Wegrich, K. (2012). Managing Regulation: Regulatory Analysis, Politics and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan.

Majone, G. (1996). Regulating Europe. Routledge.

Majone, G. (1997). From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance. Journal of Public Policy, 17(2), 139-167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00003524

Murillo, M. V. (2001). Labor Unions, Partisan Coalitions, and Market Reforms in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.

Pierre, J. & Peters, B. G. (2000). Governance, Politics and the State. Palgrave Macmillan.

Rodríguez de la Vega, G. (2024). De la transparencia pasiva a la transparencia activa: Políticas públicas para implementar el Acuerdo de Escazú en Tucumán. El Observatorio, 2, 21-42. https://revistas.unsta.edu.ar/index.php/OBS/article/view/1077/1320

Sioshansi, F. P. (Ed.). (2008). Competitive Electricity Markets: Design, Implementation, Performance. Elsevier.

Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and Its Discontents. W. W. Norton y Company. https://archive.org/details/globalizationits0002stig

Tommasi, M. & Spiller, P. T. (2007). The Institutional Foundations of Public Policy in Argentina: A Transactions Cost Approach. Cambridge University Press.

Published

16-12-2025

How to Cite

Rodríguez de la Vega, G. (2025). The challenge of liberalisation of the Argentine Wholesale Electricity Market in 2025: A risk governance process. El Observatorio, (4), 1–24. Retrieved from https://itinerantes.unsta.edu.ar/index.php/OBS/article/view/1204