Thomas Aquinas and Francisco Suárez on Possible Being
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53439/stdfyt40.20.2017.121-157Keywords:
Possibility, Being, creation ex nihilo, Aquinas, SuárezAbstract
In this article I consider the problematic that creation ex nihilo presents for Christian metaphysicans’ speculation regarding possible being. I explore Thomas Aquinas’s doctrine of possibility and show that, while he attempts to remain faithful to a metaphysics of creation, encounters a metaphysical difficult when presenting his account in terms of imitation. Suárez, I argue, is mindful of this difficulty and offers a corrective that unites the approaches of Thomas Aquinas as well as that of Duns Scotus. In the end, Suárez offers an original account of possible being that is faithful to the demands of a creation ex nihilo.
Downloads
References
Coombs, J. (2003). The Ontological Source of Logical Possibility in Catholic Second Scholasticism. In R. Friedman & L. Nielsen (Eds.), The Medieval Heritage in Early Modern Metaphysics and Modal Theory, 1400–1700. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Courtine, J.-F. (1990). Suarez et le système de la métaphysique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Cross, R. (2005). Duns Scotus on God. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Curley, E. M. (1984). Descartes on the Creation of Eternal Truths. The Philosophical Review, 93(4), 569-597.
Doyle, J. P. (2010). Collected Studies on Francisco Suárez S.J. (1548-1617). Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Henninger, M. (1989). Relations: Medieval Theories 1250-1325. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hoffmann, T. (2009). Scotus on the Origin of the Possibles. In S. Brown, Th . Dewender, & Th . Kobusch (Eds.), Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century. Leiden: Brill.
Maurer, A. (1950). Ens Diminutum: A Note on its Origin and Meaning. Mediaeval Studies, 12, 216-222.
Milbank, J. (1997). The Word Made Strange. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Pabst, A. (2012). Metaphysics: The Creation of Hierarchy. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans.
Ross, J. (2012). Merely Metaphysical Possibility. In G. Doolan (Ed.), The Science of Being as Being: Metaphysical Investigations. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.
Sanz, V. (1989). La teoría de la posibilidad en Francisco Suárez. Pamplona: EUNSA.
Secada, J. (2000). Cartesian Metaphysics: The Scholastic Origins of Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: University Press.
TeVelde, R. (1995).Participation and Substantiality in Thomas Aquinas. Leiden: Brill.
Wells, N. J. (1983). Francis Suárez on the Essence of Finite Being as Such, on the Existence of that Essence and Their Distinction. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.
Wippel, J. F. (1984). The Reality of Non existing Possibles according to Thomas Aquinas, Henry of Ghent, and Godfrey of Fontaines. Metaphysical Themes in Thomas Aquinas. Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy (Vol. 10). Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.
Wippel, J. F. (2000). The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas: From Finite to Uncreated Being. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.
